Reverse Mortgages Rules To Change Positively And Negatively For Retirees – from Forbes.com, by Jamie Hopkins

Jamie Hopkins’ post from Forbes.com, Sep 21, 2017

A number of recent articles stated that the government’s new reverse mortgage changes (Mortgagee Letter 2017-12) will make the program less attractive to borrowers. However, this might have been an initial overreaction. While the program is being adjusted, the changes to the program could improve the market, lower costs for some borrowers, and secure the long-term health of the program.

The changes are mostly in response to a 2016 actuarial report showing the FHA costs of running the HECM program. Starting October 2, some major changes are coming to the HECM reverse mortgage industry as the government aims to strengthen the long run projections of the program. According to HUD Secretary Ben Carson, “[w]e have a responsibility to make changes that balance our mission with our responsibility to protect taxpayers[.] Furthermore, Carson noted that the changes are “needed and prudent steps to put the HECM program on a more sustainable footing so that it can remain a resource for senior borrowers[.]” This point cannot be overstated – the HECM program is a valuable resource for seniors, as it can be an effective way to tap into home equity to support retirement. For more information on how to properly utilize home equity and reverse mortgages, check out resources from experts like the Funding Longevity Taskforce at The American College, or Dr. Tom Davison’s Tools for Retirement Planning.

Let’s take a quick look at how the program will be changing. There are three essential differences which will take effect starting October 2, 2017. First, upfront HECM mortgage insurance premiums will be increased for certain borrowers, but lowered for others, as compared to the current system. Second, the ongoing mortgage insurance premiums will be lowered, bringing down the total compounding rate cost for most borrowers. This could put rates more in line with the rates of traditional mortgages and the rates of home equity lines of credit. Thirdly, principal limit factors will be changed, which impacts the amount of home equity that will be available for homeowners to tap into at various ages under the HECM program. Let’s examine the specifics of each of these three major changes, and how each one will affect borrowers, and the potential impact each one could have on the marketplace.

 Changes in Upfront Mortgage Insurance Premiums: In the past, a borrower would be charged an upfront Mortgage Insurance Premium (MIP) amount based on the amount being withdrawn from their home equity. For instance, if a borrower took 60 percent or less of the loan proceeds upfront, the upfront MIP rate was 0.5 percent of the “maximum claim amount” (typically the appraised home value at time of loan). However, if a borrower took more than 60 percent of the loan proceeds upfront, the rate would have been 2.5 percent As such, the program was set up to essentially dissuade people from taking large lump sum amounts all at once. However, that incentive will now be gone, as all borrowers will now be charged a flat 2 percent, regardless of the amount borrowed. For those not taking a large percentage of their loan proceeds upfront, the initial MIP amount will be higher, increasing the upfront costs for these consumers. However, for those who would have taken more than 60 percent upfront, their upfront costs will actually go down as compared with the old program.

  • Market Impact of Changes in Upfront Mortgage Insurance Premiums: Since one disincentive to take a large lump sum amount disappears with the new MIP change, the market could see a slight increase in the amounts of initial withdrawals. However, borrower behavior is not expected to change dramatically as a result, because the industry and professionals alike have been trending away from large lump sum distributions for years now. However, one reverse mortgage option has been to establish a HECM line of credit just in case it might be needed in the future. Some companies have been offering this arrangement for a low or almost no upfront cost. Now that there will be higher upfront costs for setting up a standby HECM line of credit, this will likely change.

Lower Ongoing Borrower Costs: Coupled with the increased upfront change to the MIP rate, ongoing MIP rates will also change. Historically, the annual MIP was 1.25 percent of the outstanding loan balance. This is now being reduced to 0.5 percent of the outstanding loan balance, which could translate into thousands of dollars of savings each year for a borrower. For instance, a borrower with a $300,000 loan balance would save roughly $1,000 a year in MIP payments under the new system. Lowering the ongoing rate really helps those borrowers who have outstanding loan balances, which in some cases could offset the larger upfront MIP charges over the life of the loan. However, for borrowers using a standby line of credit, the lower ongoing costs will not be helpful until they actually take a withdrawal from the HECM.

  • Market Impact of Lower Ongoing Borrower Costs: Lowering ongoing costs improves the attractiveness of the program as compared to a traditional mortgage or home equity line of credit by bringing the overall interest rates more in line. While upfront costs can’t be ignored, consumers might actually gravitate towards the lower ongoing costs as most HECM borrowers did borrow upfront and did not just set up and sit on a HECM line of credit. Also the change to the annual MIP rate impacts how fast the loan grows, as well as how fast the line of credit grows. In essence, by lowering the MIP rate, the line of credit will grow more slowly. This is a welcome change for the program because reasonable line of credit growth limits are needed to prevent the program from insuring unreasonable amounts in the future.

Changes in Principal Limit Factors: This change will have a significant impact on the amount homeowners will be able to borrow through a reverse mortgage. There are essentially two changes occurring. First, is the lowering of the interest rate “floor” from 5 percent to 3 percent. Second, is a general reduction in the principal limit factor tables. The changes are somewhat complicated to explain, and the details are not all that important for consumers. The outcomes for consumers are what really matter. Generally, an older borrower for a reverse mortgage produces a higher principal limit, meaning they can borrow more, all else being equal, than a younger borrower. By lowering the “floor” rate it is likely that lenders will have to offer lower interest rates in order to maximize the amount of money a borrower will qualify for from the HECM. Ultimately, this could be very beneficial for the borrower, as it could bring down the costs of the program. However, it cannot go without saying that borrowers will now have access to less home equity from which to borrow than in the past because the principal limit factor tables will be lower.

  • Market Impact of Changes in Principal Limit Factors: The lowered rate floor will most likely result in a more competitive reverse mortgage market. It will encourage lenders to offer lower lender margins in order to maximize principal limits for borrowers. Ultimately, this could bring down the cost for the borrower. This reduction in rates and lower principal limit factors will also slow the line of credit growth and debt amount. Again, it appears that the changes might benefit borrowers with larger withdrawals and not be as beneficial for those using a line of credit approach. This will also help reduce the number of mortgages that are transferred to the FHA overtime, reducing the FHA cost to administer the program.

While the reverse mortgage program is changing, not all positive for borrowers and not all negative, the heart and soul of the program remains. The HECM allows seniors to tap into their home equity and be better prepared financially to age in place. The reverse mortgage still remains an underutilized program. While the costs and fees need to be understood by any borrower, the benefits also need to be understood. Unfortunately, most people know little about either today. Financial advisers also need to learn more about the ways reverse mortgages and home equity lines of credit can fit into a comprehensive retirement income plan. Hopefully, one certain benefit of these changes will be an increased awareness of the program and better utilization of home equity assets to help senior Americans enjoy more financial security throughout retirement.